Recommended content

Judge rejects counterproposal for cannabis firm Fire & Flower sale process

A counterproposal by a syndicate of parties that opposed a proposed stalking-horse agreement between cannabis retailer Fire & Flower and its largest shareholder, an affiliate of convenience store operator Alimentation Couche-Tard, was rejected by an Ontario judge.

In doing so, the Ontario Superior Court also approved the proposed sale and investment solicitation process (SISP) brought by the Couche-Tard affiliate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fire & Flower, headquartered in Toronto, was granted creditor protection in early June under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), allowing the company to maintain day-to-day operations and consult with stakeholders over its future.

Shortly after, in an affidavit filed with the court, Shawn Dym, Fire & Flower’s second-largest shareholder, called the SISP “truncated” and a “fire sale.”

Dym and his syndicate argued the deal wasn’t in the best interest of Fire & Flower or its investors.

The judge sided with the Alimentation Couche-Tard affiliate, which owns

Read full article on Marijuana Business Daily

Follow us on Instagram or join us on facebook page

Be first to rate

Marijuana Business Daily
Source

More news