Sarkonak’s transgression, according to both the CBA and now the Advocates’ Society, is that she not only criticized judicial decisions, but that she chastised the judges who made those decisions. Specifically, she tied their rulings from the bench to their past activism as lawyers. Sarkonak argued that the judges’ current penchant for racialized sentencing, consistent with past activism, and creating protected rights for drug dealing criminals, are deserving of public scrutiny.
Read full article on The Growth Op
