The claimant was seeking $50,000 for the professed purpose of “making discrimination against transgender children in health care expensive.” The claimant also wanted the BCHRT decision to be “prominently” posted, in perpetuity, anywhere the physician works. Surprisingly, Devyn Cousineau, who wrote the decision, agreed with the impugned physician that this “would serve no purpose other than to punish him.” (Apparently publishing his name, fining him and demanding that he provide “gender-affirming care” in the future, under legal threat, was punishment enough.)
Read full article on The Growth Op
