On Wednesday, Kirchmeier quizzed Galloway on his understanding of university policy, of his familiarity with her Twitter account, and of the investigation that a former judge made into his case, among other things. Aside from being halted frequently by Justice Sharma for raising irrelevant lines of questioning, she also received a few objections from Galloway’s lawyer, Daniel Burnett, for attempting to bring in “bad act evidence” — that is, trying to use past unrelated behaviour to attack Galloway’s credibility. Initial gentle warnings from Justice Sharma went unheeded, causing them to grow into terse instructions to stop. While seasoned lawyers know where the boundaries of cross-examination are, Kirchmeier is demonstrably blind.
Read full article on The Growth Op
